deviant art





Login
Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour Lost Password?
Deviant Login
Shop
 Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]

More from ~nihlton

Featured in Groups:

Details

April 30, 2006
101 KB
662×398
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 38
Favourites: 63 [who?]
Views: 3,079 (2 today)
Downloads: 1,517 (0 today)
[x]
:iconnihlton:
they just found another intermediate fossil, closing the gap between fish and amphibians. not a good sign for fundie christians.
:icon:
Add a Comment:
 
love 0 0 joy 1 1 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconheidelbergkid:
Mood: Humor ~HeidelbergKid May 13, 2012  New member
LOL! I find this really cute. The reconstruction looks very nice, and furthermore, the whole thing has been sketched and coloured. When I do hand drawings, I always sketch them without penciling in, so this gives me a lot of confidence in myself. I tip my hat to you, good man.

I only have one little negative comment to make: portraying the origins debate as "Darwin vs. Jesus" tends to alienate a lot of people, namely moderate Christians. They don't know much about Darwin, but they do know about Jesus, so the false dichotomy lumps them in with the fundies. I know this wasn't your intent, but you need to be careful this area to avoid such happening. Of course, Tiktaalik climbing out of a pond to bite Adam's leg would be good without this problem.... All in all, you done a good job, especially with the actual drawing part. Just be careful to keep the fundies with the darks and the moderates with the lights, and keep them away from each other when washing ;)
Reply
:iconprimevalraptor:
Lol. so true ^^

--
kenzen naru tamashii wa,
kenzen naru seishin to,
kenzen naru nikutai ni yadoru
Reply
:iconetoileivoire:
I cannot even begin to tell you how hard this made me laugh. xD

--
The only exciting way to do it is really blow it loud! The teacher is going, “ Piano! Piano!” You go, “It’s not a fucking piano! It’s a clarinet... you weird-talking person.”
--Eddie Izzard
Reply
:iconred-tatsu:
Awesome. I'm really glad that I'm not as small as that Jesus-fish. Or, y'know, not ALIVE when Tiktaalik was around.
Reply
:iconmarsmar:
Tiktaalik is only another thing. Evolution was proved far before Tiktaalik, but creationists would deny. They can see all of evolution happen right before their eyes and they will still deny such a fact.

--
scientia est potentia and deus est mortuus.
Reply
:iconevilblackknight:
Fact? Umm... no. Evolution doesn't hold up to scientific method. Strangely, evolutionists apparantly slept through that part of Jr. High science, where they teach basic scientific method. To put it another way, you can't get something from nothing and can't give what you don't have. My bettas will never, ever, ever, spawn anything but another betta. I can breed to bring out a recessive color, but I won't be seeing any northern pike in the tank.

Think I'm wrong? Fruit flies. We've been subjecting them to all sorts of experiments for right around 150 years now. They have a 9 day life cycle, resulting in over 6000 generations of flies. Yet...we've not produced a single housefly (higher up the "evolutionary" scale) in the lab. That's because fruit flies, surprisingly enough, only have FRUIT FLY dna. They can't "evolve" into a housefly, because they don't have the DNA to do it.

I'll "believe" in evolution, when I can reproduce it in the lab.

-EBK
"Logic! What do they teach them in these schools?" Prof Digory Kirke from "The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe"
Reply
:iconstablefly:
If you actually believe that evolutionary sciences don't hold up to scientific method you are out of your head. Evolution has been reproduced in the lab a number of times. it has been done with Bacteria and Algae, It has also occurred in the field with plants, fish and reptiles, the forces that shape it are speciation, natural selection and sexual selection ( some times a combination of all three). Anyhow I'm not here to try to educate you, go do that yourself. To get you started however, I will point out a few things... There is no such thing as an evolutionary scale... There have never been any experiments done, not a single one, to try to turn a fruit fly into a housefly because that's not how evolution works... and Tiktaalik is an intermediate, (and a great one at that) not a missing link or any other nonsense the ignorant would call it.

--
Shhhhh.... Listen..... Do you smell that?
Reply
:iconmarsmar:
"Strangely, evolutionists apparantly slept through that part of Jr. High science, where they teach basic scientific method."
(SPOILER), "It's in the bible" does not count as the scientific method.

"Think I'm wrong? Fruit flies. We've been subjecting them to all sorts of experiments for right around 150 years now. They have a 9 day life cycle, resulting in over 6000 generations of flies. Yet...we've not produced a single housefly (higher up the "evolutionary" scale) in the lab."

1. You're saying that because we haven't turned one species of fly into a species THAT ALREADY EXISTS, evolution is wrong. That's a completely failed argument. Evolution, even with man directing it, won't make an exact copy of an already existing species.

2. We have observed speciation: [link]

3. There's no "higher up in the evolutionary scale". Evolution isn't some ladder with man on top, it's more of a branching tree and on each tip, there's the species living today. As long as a species can survive in an environment, it's just as any other species.

4. I'll "believe" in evolution, when I can reproduce it in the lab.
Because if you can't do it in your garage, then it's not science! Might as well say the human genome project is complete bunk because you can't do it in your mom's basement either.

Here's a website with a list of references to scientific papers on speciation: [link]

Now go learn what evolution is and how it works before acting like a complete dumbass.

""Logic! What do they teach them in these schools?" Prof Digory Kirke from "The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe""

"A lot of ID advocates repeat the same arguments over and over, apparently lifting them from ID websites, as if they had not been pretty well exhausted in the preceding comments, which total more words than A Tale of Two Cities, a reading experience you will find much more enjoyable."
Roger Ebert (see, I can quote non-scientists talking about evolution too!)

--
scientia est potentia and deus est mortuus.
Reply
:iconevilblackknight:
You can't give what you don't have. If you don't have the DNA, you can't breed something else.

Dumbass.
Reply
:iconamnioticoef:
Well, the novel DNA is actually produced by mutation. Think of mutation as providing the block of marble, natural selection chipping it into shape (an imperfect analogy, but a useful one).

--
Do you like biology/worldbuilding? [link]

Help save rhinos: [link]
Reply
:icon:
Add a Comment: